Friday, 25 of May of 2012

Category » Women in Tech

Two pioneering women programmers

National Center on Women and Information Technology is wrapping up its summit today. I’ve attended much of the first two days, and the presentations on research and projects related to women’s opportunities in computing have been some of the best I’ve encountered anywhere. Lots to write about in those presentations! Let me begin with a little story about two remarkable programmers, Lucy Simon Rakov and Patricia Palombo.

Lucy Simon Rakov and Patricia Palombo were the recipients of the NCWIT Pioneer Award, and girl, were they ever pioneers! These two women were programmers for the Mercury space program, the first to send a person into space and home again. They did all of this with about 120 KB of raw computing power! (The next time I hear some would-be Steve Jobs tell me his code is elegant, I’m gonna laugh in his face.)

Mark Guzdial has a nice post on these great women on his Computing Education Blog:

NCWIT Pioneer Awards to two women of Project Mercury: Following their passions http://bit.ly/Lslrio


The STEM Profession that Women Dominate

Posted a new piece on Smart Data Collective earlier this week – “The STEM Profession that Women Dominate.”

Hint – it’s a profession near and dear to my heart, and if you’re reading this – yours, too.


Where the girls are

Who says women are a minority in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM)? Well, if you put it that way, I do, and so do lots of others. And there’s data to support that claim.

But those fields are not all one homogeneous block. As I’ve written before, the worst of the lot is computer sciences, where the proportion of women has been dropping for more than two decades.

But I know which STEM field has women galore. Do you? I just wrote an article about it – will post next week.


Leave a comment

Absolut gets it, the tech community doesn’t.

Demi Moore appeared pregnant and bare on the cover of Vanity Fair magazine. The image was both stunning and beautiful, and it drew a lot of attention.

In a meeting with advertising client Absolut, Vanity Fair proposed an ad for the vodka maker’s famed art series. In it, the iconic vodka bottle form would appear painted onto the back of a woman. The presentation even featured a live model, undraped to reveal her advertising-adorned skin. Absolut’s reaction? “You know how many letters we’ll get from the women’s movement? How degrading this is to women?” Vanity Fair countered by pointing out the positive response to the Demi Moore cover. Absolut’s people stood their ground, pointing out that there was a difference between editorial use of nudity and using nudity “in a commercial way.” That was nearly twenty years ago, so you’d think everybody would get it by now.

In the past few days, there has been a lot of discussion in the tech community about a video featuring a dancing woman wearing a tech company t-shirt and not much else. One woman says she emailed the tech company a month ago objecting to the video, but got no response. Last week, another woman tweeted her strong objections. She certainly got a response! A stream of tweets
called her unprofessional, her language inappropriate, and even accused her of damaging her employer’s brand. That brand was a CUSTOMER of theirs, how stupid could they get? In the end, the tech company made an unconvincing apology.

Absolut gets it, these guys don’t.

Among the many comments left on the many blogs discussing this, I took note of one from a man who says that if the video had featured a ripped man dancing in the t-shirt, that would not bother him. But it’s never, ever a man.

It also amused me to see any man in tech suggest that profanity equates to lack of professionalism. The tech community’s baseline vocabulary drips with profanity. I went to engineering school with army, navy and merchant marine men, and their language was angelic by comparison with what I hear at the average coders’ meetup these days.

The reputation of that company and the men who lead it has been damaged this week. If only these men had trusted one woman mentor or staff member or one male mentor or staff member who got it the way that Absolut gets it, they could have steered clear of this incident altogether. If only they would have taken the first email objecting to the ad seriously, they could have minimized the impact. Failing those, they should at least have known enough not to start telling off an angry, self-confident woman on twitter, but they didn’t.

I won’t say where their heads must have been, but it must be pretty dark in there.


The brogrammer culture

Bloomberg BusinessWeek published a piece on the male programming culture last week,“The Rise of the ‘Brogrammer.’” I would seriously like to believe that this is a just an April Fool’s gag, but I know it’s a month too early, and this stuff isn’t a gag.

Fortunately, this article is the only place where I have encountered a story of recruiters inviting programmers to a party featuring naked women. But the emphasis on male bonding and drinking, that stuff I witness every day.

Among the comments was this delightful remark by Danilo Stern-Sapad: “Exclusion of women is for douchegrammers.” Well said, Danilo! However, Danilo also goes around calling himself “Brogrammer for Life™.” Yes, he really uses the trademark symbol.

When I studied engineering decades ago, I believed that the next generation of women would have no idea of the crap that their mothers and grandmothers were up against. It turns out I was dead wrong, at least when it comes to the tech sector. Today’s tech culture makes the dinosaurs I knew back in engineering school look enlightened.


1 comment

Great read on women and computing

When I was a student, I imagined that decades later, young women in technology would not be able to imagine my world. It was 90% men in my program, and many were not ready to adapt to competition from women, or even from men of other races. I remember working late one night, and walking by a men’s room as a guy wandered out, still in the process of zipping up – after all, he wasn’t expecting to bump into any women there. That wasn’t really an unusual event.

Today, that engineering program is still 90% men. I could not have imagined that. Nor could I have imagined that my early career was actually the time of peak participation for women in computing, and that the proportion of women in computing today would be half the level it was in the mid-1980s.

Last night, I attended a dinner for software developers. Of about 20 people, I was the only woman. The night before, at a professional meeting, perhaps 10 of more than 100 attendees were women. Lately, I have spoken others about the higher proportion of women in computing in the 1980s, and some simply did not believe me.

IEEE Computer Society has produced a damned good book on the history and trends of women’s participation in computing. If you care about this issue, read the book:

Gender Codes: Why Women are Leaving Computing


Leave a comment

Steps forward, steps back

In the past few years, I’ve been horrified to see that the number of women around me at tech business meetings and conferences is dwindling. We taken far more than one step backward from 1987, when 42% of software developers in the US were women.

42%! People don’t believe me when I quote that number. I first learned it in this wonderful piece, Girls Go Geek… Again!, by Anna Lewis of Fog Creek Software, and I checked her reference, too. Women’s involvement in computing has been declining for two decades.

Ms. Lewis points out some indications that this trend in now beginning to reverse. Nice to hear that! Read Girls Go Geek… Again! for the provocative facts on women and computing, and while you’re at it, enjoy the fabulous images and quotes from a 1960s article on women in computing.